[faith]
[hope]
[love]

Thursday, May 25, 2006

modern day pharisees

As a quick disclaimer, those who read regularly will probably know this already, but I pull no punches in this post. Read at your own risk, and possible discomfort.

Philosopher, poet, and critic, George Santayana, once wrote, "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." It is a saying that has become cliche, often repeated (or misstated) and often glazed over. Sadly, today we could re-work that saying to perhaps be stated as, those who obsess on the past are blinded to the parallels that can be drawn with the present. By thoroughly understanding something in its true historical context, we can often inadvertently place it solely in the past and avoid confronting similar circumstances in our own lives. Let's think about this for a moment.

Have Christians come full circle? Are many of us now the modern incarnation of the Pharisees? What about Zealots? Or Herodians and Sadducees?

Don't be too hasty in forming your answer, think about it, a casual dismissal of the idea could be just as telling. Let's look at the Pharisees first: highly righteous, adhered to strict laws of purity, abhorred sinners and would not associate with sinners except to publicly show their benevolence, and they believed that God would send the Messiah only once everyone stopped sinning. How different is that from people today? Of any group out there, who are most often labeled as having "holier than thou" attitudes? Why exactly is it that some people feel that people seeking faith have to check their sins and worldly ways at the door of the church, often before even being baptized?

You want to know how I could possibly think Zealots relate to today? How popular is that Left Behind book series, and what are they about? Oh, yeah something about Jesus coming back to resurrect the faithful, judge and persecute the unfaithful, establish an earthly kingdom, and lead a final battle to defeat evil. Sound like the Zealots to you, with their hope for a violent overthrowing of their enemies and establishment of a righteous political entity?

Herodians and Sadducees should be fairly obvious by now, right? Let's see, Herodians and Sadducees were both collaborators with the Roman occupiers, essentially playing nice with the powers that be in order to gain influence to maintain their status quo. The Sadducees went even a few steps further and were even more elitist and righteous than the Pharisees, as they rejected many of the newer teachings of the day (resurrection, afterlife, spirits, etc). To me, that smacks of the stereotypical fundamental/conservative/right-wing Christian political lobbyist groups that are in the news more and more frequently.

I told you I wasn't going to pull any punches here, and it's not because I think I am somehow better than anyone else. I'd be the first in line to pronounce that I am not perfect, I don't have all the answers, and I struggle with sin and Jesus' way of life. However, I find it troubling to think that we have come so far, only to find ourselves right back where we started. I often wonder if Jesus were to come back again today, would he try to come to the various Christian groups first, only to find our reaction to him reminiscent of how the Jews responded two thousand years ago? Makes you wonder...

6 comments:

May 25, 2006 4:19 PM , mikster:

Another phrase comes to mind here as well...'what goes around, comes around.'

 

May 25, 2006 7:24 PM , Alan:

I am not disagreeing with you.

As for learning about how history creeps back up on us....think in terms of reducing citizens rights, creating fear of outsiders among us and without, a President who can sign bills into law, but is not bound to the law he just signed. All in the name of Jesus and righteousness...good vs. evil...and then read about the rise of Hitler. Too many right wing/fundamentalists can't see it, but then after all.....thought has become a spectator sport in America.

 

May 26, 2006 1:48 AM , Will Spina:

Definitely, YOUR best post since I have been reading.

Good and accurate descriptions of past factions among God's people. I think the application to modern day issues is highly appropriate.

Legalism leaves us with precision but no relationship.
Religious Zealousy leaves us with converts but no disciples.
Religious Sadduceeism leaves us with structure and organization but no passion.
Herodian conspirators (people who can't leave the world behind) manage to look the part of being Christians but be lukewarm and status quo, as you said. OFten make statements like, "God just wants us to be happy". Its egocentric ways result in a comfortable non committal status quo but no real priorities. I have seen the children of the herodians suffer the worse. As the wealth increases their spiritual lives go depleted.

So what do you think about the Essenes?

 

May 26, 2006 9:16 AM , James:

Will,

I think probably the closest thing to the Essenes in our day would be something like the Mennonite or Amish communities that exist. Though don't misunderstand me, Essenes pretty much wrote off the world around them as lost and felt that isolating themselves on the outskirts of society was the only way to redeem themselves and prepare for a coming new age. This new age they looked for would be one where the temple was rebuilt and new priests would be found amongst their group who were holding to true meaning and practice of the Law and prophets. They focused a lot on community and purity, and new members to the group were scrutinized carefully. Mennonites on the other hand choose enhance their spiritual life by focusing on communal living and ideals, sometimes choosing a simpler way of living. In the case of the Amish, non-essential technology is avoided to keep distractions to their spiritual life and community living to a minimum. It's funny because sometimes I think they have a good thing going, because as a telecommuter, I can totally understand how technology can isolate people and make forming community difficult.

I don't know that I can think of a well known group that would correlate much better to the Essenes, even if this match up isn't ideal. I think the Mennonite Church is interesting and to be commended for such focus on community, and the fact that they do interact with the world with their peace affirming ways.

---
Alan,

While I do have great concerns for many of the personal liberty infringing activities that are taking place today, and I abhor the way rhetoric is creating new prejudicial divides, I try to keep this blog fairly politically benign. Now talking about how some groups are politicizing God, Jesus and Christianity -- that I could write about, but for now, I think I'll just let that simmer.

 

May 26, 2006 2:39 PM , Will Spina:

James,
I think there are elements of all of the groups in any one church. It's just going to be which is the dominant influence. I think it safe to say our dominant culture has been Phariseeism. There are occasional influxes of the Essenes though. Christian Universities to some extent. Retreats to some extent. Bible Summer Camps to some extent. Speaking of which, I am on my way to one of those semi essene experiences right now at Camp.

 

May 31, 2006 1:36 PM , Debi:

James,

Thanks for really getting me thinking! This is a GREAT post!